Topic Closed
|
DigsBoards
![]() outside world
![]() wedding mania (Page 7)
|
This topic is 27 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: wedding mania |
|
yeefan Head of the House |
I certainly think you have every right to be miffed about the evil granny, leanne, but like BG said, if she's someone that you and Sean only have to see every once in awhile, I can see why he and his family would find it easier not to cause any trouble with her. It's so tricky dealing with family dynamics that I generally find it best to stay out of the dramas of anyone's except my own ... most people know consider it just fine for them to criticize their parents/sibling/grandparents whatever themselves, but get very huffy if anyone else does. As for the big weddings thing, I'd just like to say (again) that I really, really feel strongly that big weddings are not inherently worse than small weddings, or vice versa, that it's completely a matter of what's right for a given couple. I have to confess that I tend to find it just as annoying when people deride all big weddings as a complete waste of money as when I see wedding magazines promoting extravagant weddings as the only options ... as with most things, I just don't think there's one perfect solution that fits all people. I had a great big formal and yes, very expensive wedding, full of family and friends who all seemed very very happy to be sharing in our day, and for Ginsu and I, and our many loved ones too, it was an all-around perfect way to celebrate the beginning of our married life together. [This message has been edited by yeefan (edited 07-18-2002).] IP: Logged |
|
Fenchurch Housemate |
quote: Not putting your opinion down, just giving an alternate view- I guess it all really depends on your personality. I personally do not need to have a huge hoopla and spend all that money just to prove to Great Aunt Sally and my parent's neighbors and 300 other people that I am serious about marriage. My boy and I know that we are serious, that's all that really matters to me. So what if they snicker at my informal wedding in the park with a buffet catered by Olive Garden. We will be comfortable and happy, and not in debt. IP: Logged |
|
suzette Housemate |
I think when it comes down to it - it's the marriage that's most important - not how much the wedding costs. The marriage lasts a lot longer than the actual wedding. That said, C. and I are having a large informal FUN wedding next April, and I'm extremely excited. Edited to finish my thought. [This message has been edited by suzette (edited 07-18-2002).] IP: Logged |
|
leanne Housemate |
Dew, here's the way I see it: Given that one has the requisite funds, you can easily do the easy thing and merely plug in all the socially correct things that modern weddings are "supposed" to have. Like a reception. Why a reception? Why not just a ceremony? Or wedding favours. Why do you "HAVE" to give wedding favours? Or white dress, or formal attire or whatever, you pick any element of a modern wedding, outside of standing there holding hands and pledging your love and devotion to each other, and it could easily go out the window. So, I think it takes a whole lot of trouble and money to ensure that you've done just what everyone else has done. What I find with less formal ceremonies is that the couple has had to think long and hard about what is important to them, to define what a marriage ceremony is. It isn't a big pouffy white dress, it is an exchange of vows. The level of true community participation often rises with informal weddings (potlucks, granny makes the cake or some secret family recipe, the guests have to hike out to a beach or park and interact with the ceremony by standing in a big circle around the bride and groom - just a couple of examples of theoretical informal ceremony elements). Anyone can pick a church to walk down the aisle, and a hall and a caterer and a dj service or band. And almost everybody does this. This cheapens the ceremony for me. Because I want my own future wedding as unique as my relationship and I would hope that most couples would. But, informal and smaller ceremonies are steeped in the kind of initmacy that strong communities of family and friends are best at. The bride gets to spend time with everyone, talking and sharing her day with her community and not just catching folks at the reception line. Couples and their family's aren't paying $50/$70/$100 a plate to food and booze near strangers or family members who aren't part of their regular lives. Couples are executing plans that they dreamed into existence in creativity instead of fretting over whether they are excelling at each list item in the The Knot's Wedding To Do List. Do I explain myself well enough? (I'm thinking of an analogy - You could go buy a couch for $2000 or teach yourself how to re-upholster an antique that you rescued from a garage sale -> which is worth more to you personally? To me, it would be the one I restored, tho, granted, others would prefer the store-bought) IP: Logged |
|
Princessjeanne Housemate |
quote: And that is exactly what it should have been... a beautiful and perfect way for the two of you to begin your lives together. Not to have a wedding just to have a wedding (big or small) was my point; it's supposed to be a beginning of a life together, not a way of proving things to others. Congratulations on doing things your way, yeefan and BionicGirl and leanne and everyone! IP: Logged |
|
Brookiebaby Housemate |
I have two points to be made which offer differing opinions.... 1. A formal wedding doesn't have to be expensive. You can have a formal ceremony, be dressed formally, and not have all of the ritzy glitzy stuff that makes it expensive. 2. Expensive weddings don't necessarily mean that you were spending money on things that don't mean anything to you in the long run. I know that my mother is forever thankful that she had a big wedding because she was able to invite people from all aspects of her life to celebrate her special day with her and my father. She looks back on that day incredibly fondly. The huge expense was flying a good number of people from her family to the States and giving them lodging. This was her gift as she wanted them their and they couldn't afford it otherwise. The other expense was finding a reception hall to FIT all of the people that they wanted to be there. My point you ask? Expensive doesn't necessarily mean evil. Sometimes the money is spent on things that are important to you, even if its only for one day. IP: Logged |
|
leanne Housemate |
Specifically to Yeefan: I do accede that some big formal weddings can be fun and magical and of course, some small weddings are horrid, too. I did note that you were creative with things like your invitations (making beautiful ones yourself) and worked hard to incorporate some of your ancestral traditions into the proceedings. I admire this sort of thing and this kind of involvement sets one apart to a great degree from those who "buy" a wedding (as I conceive it in my head). But, as much as I don't wish to offend anyone who has or is planning or believes in expensive formal weddings (tho I don't mind being a bit of a thorn!), I still can't get over the conspicuous material consumption that the traditional modern wedding is. I mean, Yeefan (sorry to pick on you, but here you are I guess it is a matter of perspective. And, if the money is there for the wedding, the happiness of bride, groom, family and friends are worth any amount of money. Just makes me choke, is all. And, my experience tends to bear out my earlier observations that the more informal or non-traditional the wedding was, the more fun it was for me as a guest, the more the bride and groom seemed engaged in the entire proceedings and the more meaningful the whole ceremony seemed to be. IP: Logged |
|
yeefan Head of the House |
Okay, I'm going to try and respond to leanne's post in a way that's not overly-defensive, because I know she's not attacking me personally here, right? I don't think people should ever spend more than they can afford on anything -- weddings, house, car, whatever -- and most especially when they're only doing it because they think they're supposed to. (And by afford, I don't mean just that one has the cash available, or can get a loan, but that spending that money doesn't take away from something more important -- e.g., we didn't blow our savings or my parents savings on our wedding, because I do think that would be very unwise spending). If I (or more to the point, my parents, because they were generous enough to pay for the wedding) had been living under different financial conditions, I obviously would have figured out a way to do the wedding a lot cheaper. But the fact is, my parents wanted to give me this wedding, and could afford it, and Ginsu and I both like beautiful things, and we both have very large extended families and good friends that mean a lot to us and that we wanted to have there, and all these things factored together to mean that the wedding was expensive. But we spent a lot of time ensuring that the wedding was very specific to who we are as a couple, and the ceremony itself was very simple, very meaningful, and very much representative us. And people are still telling us how much of a blast they had at our wedding, and that it was one of the most fun ones they've been to. Bottomline is that it's not how much you spend -- grand sum or very little at all -- but what you do with it. I just don't think it's fair to say all expensive weddings are a waste of money. After all, everybody has different limits on what they think is outrageously expensive -- for some it might be $5000 for the wedding, for others $50,000. It's all relative, right? [This message has been edited by yeefan (edited 07-18-2002).] IP: Logged |
|
BionicGirl Housemate |
I'm in agreement with princessjeanne, brookiebaby, and yeefan. Expense is relative and making yourself happy in the here and now isn't anything to be ashamed of. I mean, we could all deny ourselves of something and put it to a better use... I could stop buying so many shoes and leanne & Sean could stop buying so many records and if we put that money together we could donate it to charity... BUT most people on these boards seem to do their part to help out in the world at large and who are any of us to judge each other's priorities? I can totally understand someone's desire to make it a huge spectacle... because it feels huge to the people getting married. The marriage is the important thing, but that doesn't mean the wedding can't be spectacularly large or extravangant. Whatever makes it special for an individual couple (w/o exceeding any budgets) is what should be done. [This message has been edited by BionicGirl (edited 07-18-2002).] IP: Logged |
|
LittleWolf Subletter |
I usually just lurk around this board, but I think it's time to pipe up. The massive amounts of money spent on a wedding is a topic close to my heart, as we're spending my father's money to plan our wedding right now. My father himself has said I should take the money and buy a house, which has given me heart palpatations. I'm a pretty frugal girl, and did not think that if I had a wedding, it would be "big." But this is New York, and you really can't do things cheaply here. So we're going all out. We're spending money on things that everyone will enjoy, meaning great location, terrific food and fantastic music. Everything else is kinda secondary. Plus, we live really far from our families (Tony's from England and mine is scattered throughout the US) so we consider this a celebration for everyone... not just ourselves. It's a bit of mental justification for such obvious expenditures. My mother doesn't let me forget it either, constantly remarking on her own wedding in the local VFW where her father's co-workers bartended and they ate cold cuts and potato salad made by my grandmother's church group. Now, I don't discount that -- it sounds lovely. She was also 22 and trying to keep my father out of the war. Circumstances change. But at the same time, she wants nothing short of the best for this celebration of her only daughter. I agree with yeefan. We only plan on doing this once, and this is the "once" we want. And it's worth it to give our families an venue to come together and celebrate. **phew** That was way more than I planned to say. IP: Logged |
|
Dewgirl Housesitter |
I agree. While I was planning a huge wedding with all the traditional trimmings, Michael and I were working very hard to make sure everything was "us". I completely agree that "cookie cutter" weddings are.. well... drab. I don't want the exact same wedding as everyone else. And much like Yeefan and Ginsu... both of us like pretty things, and money wasn't an issue, so we didn't have any problem putting money down on things that were going to make the day that much more special and more memerable for us. Which isn't at all to say that expensive is better - there were some things we were willing to spend ridiculous amounts of money on, because they were important to us... and some things we really didn't care about, like the cake (neither of us eat sweets!) that we were going to skimp on. I guess a lot of my ideas about weddings come from the idea that your wedding day is the most wonderful day of your life... a day to celebrate the fact that starting from this day forward, you will be with the person who makes you happier than anyone else.... that you have found true love. And everybody wants to celebrate that differently. For me, I want to celebrate it by looking prettier than I ever have or will...being surrounded by every person I possibly can who loves me and whom I love... and trying to share my happiness with them by sparing no effort or expense to make it an enjoyable day for them too IP: Logged |
|
leanne Housemate |
No, I'm not attacking you personally, like I said, you happen to have been the closest example at hand and I don't mind being a bit of a devil's advocate, and debating the relative meaning of large and small weddings is a bit of a useless endeavor - like I said and you echoed, where happiness is concerned, money is of no object, unless it is .I remember the weddings of my cousin and my one aunt, in particular, as examples of large formal and very expensive weddings that I was invited to that were examples of what makes me uneasy about big weddings in general. And, I too have gotten advice from a number of now married friends that eloping/super small private ceremonies were the way to go. After going through the planning stages of a more formal sort of event, I heartily agree. And, even if I were to win a million bucks tomorrow and could throw a lavish todo that reflected Sean and my personalities, I couldn't do it. One part of the expense that I haven't even mentioned yet is what the wedding industry charges for anything that has to do with ceremonies and receptions. That is a big factor in why modern weddings cost so much and that end of it sickens me, too. (When looking at a reception site, there was a big difference in prices between renting the hall for the purpose of a wedding and renting it to, say, throw a dance. If you just say the "W" word, the price starts to creep up.) It's not my intention to take away from the specialness of what you (again as an example because I know a little about your wedding and you happen to be here for this convo) and Ginsu did on your wedding day, but I know that, in an alternate universe, had you gathered your community in the forest, exchanged vows, danced about a fire and drank bottled beer, your family and friends would have still gone home knowing they had a blast and feeling that the day was infused with love and light and magic, as it was in this universe! But, that's neither here nor there - you made the choices you made and they were good choices and it was an flawless, wonderful day! Edited to apologise for being like a pitbull with a doll's leg in its mouth, I'm being a bit compulsive. I honestly don't mean any judgement on anyone's personal choices. [This message has been edited by leanne (edited 07-18-2002).] IP: Logged |
|
SLourdes Housemate |
I totally agree with Yeefan. As long as one is spending within their limits, then I don't see why having an expensive wedding is inherently bad. If you make $40,000 a year and spend $30,000 on a wedding, well then, that seems like a lot of money. However, if you make $100,000 per year, then $30,000 isn't quite so much. It really is all relative. That said, I think I will probably opt for something in the middle. I like the idea of having a formal wedding ceremony and reception, but I want to cut costs by doing things myself. I like the idea of pulling off a wedding that seems like it was expensive, but was really reasonable and reflects who my boyfriend I are as a couple. I'm a bargin shopper at heart! (Oh, and just to note, we are not engaged yet, just talking about this stuff) IP: Logged |
|
BionicGirl Housemate |
quote: Can we not blow this off? I'm sorry, but that did kind of hurt my feelings, even if I'm trying not to take it personally (I know it wasn't directed at me but it was critical of the kind of wedding I had, which was pretty important to me). I just feel blown off twice in one day. Some acknowledgement would be nice (like, from the horse's mouth), and the large wedding criticism kind of steered the conversation away from it. Informal weddings deserve respect too. [This message has been edited by BionicGirl (edited 07-18-2002).] IP: Logged |
|
emmalola Housemate |
Hey BG, I agree with you. The degree of formality does not imply importance. For one couple a beach wedding with nothing but close family and little grass skirts might be just as big an event and just as important as the enormous expensive 400 person wedding. And NEITHER will predict if the couple will stay together. so there. I'm running out of time so I will post this. IP: Logged |
|
leanne Housemate |
BG - I totally found that off-putting. I also find the statement that one likes pretty things (but really means expensive things) and those things would raise the cost of a wedding. I like pretty things too! What is a pretty thing? Would my hand knit and beaded wedding outfit not be a pretty thing because it will only cost me about $25 to make, it wouldn't be bought at a big expensive store or created by a known designer? I'll re-iterate what I said earlier: a wedding comes down to one thing: looking in each other's eyes and declaring your love and devotion to each other. Anything else is just trimmings. Me, I'm a simple girl with simple desires and simple style. My diamonds won't cost a fortune (if I bother with them at all), nor will my attire, nor will our ceremony, but each of these will be special to the only two people to who it matters: me and Sean. Everyone else be damned, not because they do not matter but because I am reducing the wedding to its essence in order that, for me and Sean, it is most potent. IP: Logged |
|
Dewgirl Housesitter |
fuck it, I'm just not going to post anymore. Aparently I can't say anything that isn't going to piss people off, so I'm just going to shut up and leave. These boards didn't used to be like this, and I'm sorry to have seen them change.
IP: Logged |
|
yeefan Head of the House |
Dewgirl, that's your prerogative of course, but I'm sorry to see you leave. I've always appreciated your presence on the boards, and understand that your comments on weddings were based on your opinions only; unfortunately, when one is stating opinions that belittle/condemn/criticize other people's life choices, it's hard to avoid hurt feelings, you know? And BG, I was pretty much under the impression that Dewgirl's feelings that bigger is better with regards to weddings was a minority opinion -- most of the big wedding defenders (like moi) weren't defending big weddings per se, just pointing out that anyone (and I know you weren't saying this I know it's impossible to avoid offense completely when discussing matters of opinion, but in general, I try to word my opinions in such a way that it's clear that I'm not saying my views are the only acceptable ones, or that what's right for me is what's right for everyone. (Apologies leanne if you were offended by the pretty things remarks -- I certainly know that pretty doesn't always equal expensive, but in terms of the sort of things I wanted for my wedding, and my own personal style, it frequently did. Locations that can accommodate 200+ people are difficult to find; attractive ones even more difficult, and when we did find them, it was generally reflected in the price. Finding someone to feed 200+ people food that looks good and tastes good was also something that I personally wasn't able to find cheaply. And I don't have the sewing ability to create a wedding dress that suits and fits me perfectly, so for me personally, I did need to spend the money to get the pretty dress. If I were more talented, and had more time to hunt around, I probably could have had things that looked pretty to me that didn't cost as much, definitely). Hope no one's taken too much umbrage at any of my remarks -- I really do believe that small weddings, big weddings, inexpensive weddings,lavish weddings, can all make for perfectly wonderful affairs. Why do we feel the need to take sides on which are better, when it seems clear that it's only a matter of which are better for the specific couple in question? [This message has been edited by yeefan (edited 07-18-2002).] IP: Logged |
|
BionicGirl Housemate |
quote: Yeah I recognize that, but thanks for the reaffirmation. I guess I just felt a little personally snubbed after I mentioned that it was offensive and there was no acknowledgement of that from Dewgirl... and it was the second time today I felt snubbed (on another thread) after my direct query was ingnored (and in that case it appeared I was being mocked; I just wanted to know if I was misinterpreting)... and I am probably overly sensitive because I found out about the death of an old coworker today and because I have had to listen to comments about my wedding IRL that I found demeaning. I recognize that I seem to end up talking about stuff here long after most others have left it, which always makes me feel weird. I know I am terribly persistant in general and that can be sometimes difficult for the people that have to deal with me... hey, it wouldn't be the first time my persistence has turned someone off... but in general I really do try to avoid making personally offensive statements as well and when I have done so I think I have attempted to apologize (and if I didn't then I apologize now). The only times I've knowingly and intentionally said something personal about someone on the boards were times when I genuinely felt like that person was being attacky (and I wasn't the only person involved in those occassions). I was just hoping for the same consideration. I don't expect to agree with everyone here nor do I expect everyone to agree with me. I just like to talk about ideas, even if sometimes those ideas are controversial. I LIKE having people that don't agree with me on these boards because it broadens my horizons. So I apologize to anyone if I've offended you in the past or if I've somehow played a role in disrupting the peaceful nature of these boards. That certainly wasn't my intention. It was the maturity and friendliness of the people here that attracted me in the first place. I don't want to run anyone off. I just want to talk to you guys... because I like you all so darn much. IP: Logged |
|
yeefan Head of the House |
Hugs, BG -- I'm so sorry to hear the boards have contributed to your rough day. I did go back and reread Dewgirl's second to last post, where she talks about the specifics of planning her wedding, and I do think she was just trying to clarify her earlier post by showing that for her personally, she can't imagine not having a big wedding -- not necessarily saying that she thinks smaller, less formal weddings for other people can't be as beautiful/meaningful for the couple involved. But anyway, I'm feeling sad and a little distressed now because I too, like you all so much, and hate to see everyone so unhappy over comments that I'm positive weren't meant to attack anyone personally ... IP: Logged |
|
BionicGirl Housemate |
quote: Thanks yee-fan. I'm feeling much better after a good cry (not realted to the boards, fear not), some good hubbie huggin', a really nice e-mail from greshya (thanks!), and just some cooling off time. Anyhow, I'm done with it and think I am able to not let singular opinions get me down at this point. I hope you're feeling better, and I'm sorry to contribute to the yee-fan blues. And I'm sorry for helping to hijack a thread once again. Let's get on with everyone planning their wonderful weddings. IP: Logged |
|
lduds Housemate |
Okay, so let's talk about dresses and then bridesmaids (if this is okay with everyone). I'm in two weddings in 2003, a bridesmaid in each and I guess I'm supposed to help out with stuff, but haven't really heard what I'm supposed to do at all. I watch "A Wedding Story" a lot (on TLC daytime) and have loved all weddings I've been to, however, I'm from LI and I guess that makes me used to formal weddings --with vianese hours and cocktail hours, etc (these two weddings will be less formal for sure). I've looked at some wedding sites for help but they all talk about how terrible brides can be and blah blah blah which I think is all crap 'cause I wouldn't have said yes to be in someone's wedding if I thought they were nasty- duh! So I guess, really, could someone tell me the traditional roles for bridesmaids? Plus what about bridesmaid dresses? All I've seen are totally ugly! [This message has been edited by lduds (edited 07-19-2002).] IP: Logged |
|
PB&J Housemate |
Iduds: I really wish my Maid of Honour would post related to your question. She is in two other weddings besides mine in a two-month period.--she could write a book. Here is what her brides are having her do: Plan and organize socials (I am not having one), throw and/or attend showers, throw bachelorette parties and do general gofer things on the wedding day (eg: help with dressing and makeup, keep bride calm, scare away stressful people) and she will sign the legal documents as a witness to the marriages. She also had a great idea I would like to share. She is packing a survival kit to bring to her weddings. Inside will be: makeup, pantyhose, stain removing wipes, pain killers, feminine hygeine products, water, cel phone, and other stuff as needed. I am so glad she is my best friend and that she agreed to be my MOH, even with all her other committments. She told me I was a great bride because I let my bridal party pick their own dresses--I just picked the colour. (one of her other brides is having her spend $400 cdn on a dress--can you imagine???) My wedding is in 2 months. I have finally warmed up to the idea (I wanted to elope) and am now actually looking forward to it. Hugs and best wishes to everyone. IP: Logged |
|
lduds Housemate |
PB&J thank you! My brides (hehe!) are just started to get into the bridemaid dress part and I think I'll be wearing matching dresses and everything, but that's not too bad. That survival kit is a great idea! I'm going to copy your post and keep it handy as a bridesmaid "to do" list. Please keep those great ideas coming! And good luck in all the upcoming weddings!! IP: Logged |
|
kena Housesitter |
Ok, I'm a little late to pitch in the discussion, but I think the whole small and informal vs big and expensive debate was mainly caused by what people consider big or small weddings. When I think "big wedding", the first thing that comes to my mind is a huge tacky thing, planned exclusively by the bride, where guests are expected to "pay for their place" by buying expensive gifts or, better, giving money, because it was very expensive to invite them after all. (I didn't invent this... one of my coworkers who was married last year gave that as a guideline to another coworker who was about to attend a wedding) The dress is some cheaply done itchy thing with tons of lace and frills, which was nevertheless insanely expensive. The food is kinda cold because there's too much people to serve at the same time. A few uncles are already drunk by the time dancing starts because they wanted to take advantage of the open bar (after all, they gave a pretty big gift to be at that wedding, it better be worth it). The bride keeps worrying whether she's doing the right thing while the groom keeps worrying about the incredible bill they'll have to pay... I let you imagine the rest. Given my stereotype of the big formal wedding (based on actual weddings, unfortunately), it's easy to understand why I wouldn't want one. That doesn't mean that I think that a big wedding can't be romantic and meaningful, it's just that most big weddings I've attended or heard about simply weren't. I guess that when Dewgirl thinks of an informal wedding, she has a different but similarly horrific thing in mind. If what she considers an informal wedding ressembles more a keg party than a meaningful ceremony, I understand her point of view about the "seriousness" of the event. IP: Logged |
|
Jacquelyn Subletter |
I just wanted to agree with yeefan. I don't think spending a lot of money means you're wasting -- I think it means that that's the way you chose to celebrate a meaningful time in your life. Everyone is different, everyone chooses different ways to live their lives -- it is no surprise that some people would be thrilled by elaborate formal affairs while others would be thrilled with a backyard cocktail party. Neither is wrong or less stunning in its monumental nature! It's just a representation of the couple and their choices! dannyboy, congratulations on the engagement! I didn't have chocolate for long 'til I knew it was for me for life either, haha. IP: Logged |
|
SmallBladder Housemate |
it's weird how something such as a wedding-planning thread can get people all riled-up and angsty, but then again, who am i to fault others for being riled-up and angsty on these boards? ![]() Dewgirl, if you are lurking, i think you are entitled to your opinion. i guess BG was hoping to perhaps get you to see that there are other ways of planning a wedding besides the ones you are used to where you live that might be acceptable and perhaps fun. imho, small weddings are a lot of fun b/c when you are invited to one, it means the couple really values your presence in their lives and wants you there for the occasion. with that being said, however, i will admit the allegation that i had a "big formal materialistic consumption oriented wedding." the reception was at a museum, fer crissake, with a four-piece string quartet playing during the cocktail hour. but the catch was that we planned everything with our interests at heart. my sis and mum and i stayed up making programs and favors and the table number thingys and we had a ton of fun. i spent assloads(tm) on a photographer because i knew he was going to capture the emotions and the moments of the day in a way that i would have wanted to remember them. maybe i am a materialistic person. i guess i just wanted people to enjoy themselves and have a good time and to show these people in my life that we were happy they were there. there are many ways to do that, but ultimately it should be in a way that suits the particular couple. IP: Logged |
|
Merimoo Housemate |
Dewgirl, please stay! I know it's probably too late, but... Personally, I would love to have a huge wedding. Even if I only invite my family (first cousins, aunts, and uncles), that's still 50 people. Family is a huge part of my life, so I would be very upset if I were not able to have them all present. But really, as everyone else has said, it's a personal choice. C'mon everybody, as fellow Digsters, we all have impeccable taste, right? IP: Logged |
|
Dewgirl Housesitter |
Thanks guys I have been lurking, and decided to come back just before seeing your posts.
IP: Logged |
|
naynay45 Housemate |
J was in a wedding this weekend that was fabulous, and I wanted to share some of the things I loved about it that I had not seen at other weddings (not that I've been to a WHOLE lot, but hey, I watch A Wedding Story from time to time ):1) The head table consisted of just the bride and groom. I thought this was great because a) it's their day and b) it meant I didn't have to sit at the table with another groomsman's horrid girlfriend by myself haha2) The favors were handwritten notes to each guest. This has to be the best favor I've ever seen because it's inexpensive, it's personal, and it makes the guests feel like their company is greatly appreciated. I think I will do this at my wedding (despite the fact that I may end up with numb hands from writing out all those cards!!). 3) During the bridal party dance, the people who stood up in the wedding danced with their dates instead of with random others who stood up in the wedding. It may have been because there were twice as many groomsmen as bridesmaids (how often does that happen?!?), but I thought it was cool because the couple showed that their love and their relationship was not the only special one there that night. Anyways, that was one of the best weddings I've been to, so I had to share in an attempt to brighten up this topic...
IP: Logged |
|
mamichan Housemate |
i wonder if i should've started a new thread for this, but here goes! my question is wedding-related... i need some feedback, advice, words of wisdom -- please help! background: my hubby's brother is getting married in december. on 12-21 saturday. it's in vermont. we live in minnesota. we both have jobs that make it really hard to take time off during the holidays. in fact, my hubby may lose his job for taking a few vacation days to go to this wedding. hubby is not close to his brother. and money is an issue for us. problem: brother doesn't understand that hubby might lose his job over this (yes, we told him, it went right over his head). i just checked out fares, it's about $350 a person, plus we need a rental car since the closest airport is albany, NY, the wedding's at a resort-inn... we're looking at over $1150 for a weekend! really, it's too much and they are unwilling to help us with costs. what to do without offending brother-in-law? IP: Logged |
|
Jacquelyn Subletter |
Oh my god, naynay, I loooove that idea, about writing personal notes to each guest! I just got my placecards in -- I ordered RSVP cards to act in their place, just with table info instead of RSVP info. Anyway, you know what I mean. So the details about where each person is sitting will be on the front and the inside was empty and I was wondering if that was weird for each one to be empty. Now I totally know what I'm going to do! Thank you so much for this sweet idea! IP: Logged |
|
Caterwaul Housemate |
quote: ugh...sounds like the BIL is kind of a jerk. Has your husband talked to his parents about this? IP: Logged |
|
journeygirl Housemate |
Oh, today I went to a tasting for a banquet my work is hosting. You have your own personal waiter, and the event planner narrates each dish as you taste it. How fun! Naynay--love those ideas! The best wedding idea I've seen lately was replacing the guestbook for a large framed black and white photo of the couple with a wide white matte. The guests signed the matting instead of the book. It was beautiful and they could hang it on the wall instead of storing it in the attic! IP: Logged |
|
yeefan Head of the House |
Mamichan, that is a tough situation. I know you mentioned that your husband isn't close to this brother, but are you guys at the point where you're still trying to figure out how to make the trip affordable, or have you pretty much decided you won't be able to attend? If you are still trying to figure out how to make it financially feasible, I had a few ideas. For plane tickets, try priceline or hotwire, which often offer very cheap tickets; for car rental, you could try and hook up with other wedding guests and try to share a car to cut down on expenses (since this is a family wedding, I assume you guys'll know a lot of the guests, and older relatives might even be willing to just give you a ride for free if they're already planning to rent a car, and know you guys are a little strapped for cash). Of course, the not being able to take time off work for fear of losing one's job is a pretty tough one to work around, and if that's really the case, I think it's fair of your husband to just tell his brother that he's very sad that he won't be able to make it out there for the actual wedding, but that he hopes the brother understands that it's not because he doesn't want to be there, just that he can't afford to lose his job. When Ginsu's little sister told us she couldn't come to our wedding because she'd just been accepted into a year-abroad program in Nepal that she thought would be an amazing experience for her, we were both really bummed out, but we certainly weren't angry with her. If the brother isn't a total jerk, he'll probably be disappointed, but hopefully understanding as well. IP: Logged |
|
mamichan Housemate |
i knew the digsters would be more understanding. thanks guys we've talked to mom (hubby's mom) about it -- she's pretty upset about the dates too. she even urged BIL to change the dates (before they were set in stone) knowing that it would be hard for us to get out there at that time -- and i guess she used us as a main reason in favor of switching the dates. apparently, that wasn't a big enough incentive for BIL. which irks me. unfortunately, hubby feels like this decision will the the "make or break" point of his relationship w/ his brother. today i sent out an email to BIL and fiancee asking for dates, info, etc with a quick explanation of why we can't stay for a long time (or even at all)... we'll see what happens, i guess. IP: Logged |
|
ginsu classic Head of the House |
Hey Mamichan, another way to cut down on the cost is for just your hubby to go. It's his bro after all, and if he's not too close with him, then you're probably even less close. If you ended up not going, perhaps you could make/write/give them something a little extra with their gift. I think it would be really unfortunate if at least your husband didn't go to his brother's wedding when they both live in the same country. I think Yee-Fan's suggestion about tagging along with someone else's rental is a good idea, too...I'm all for the carpool action. IP: Logged |
|
lduds Housemate |
This is totally off topic with what is going on here now-- although I must say it is crap that brother is not caring enough about family to alter the date a little, people have so many expenses already at that late December date... anyway, one of my friends is looking for ways to honor close girlfriends without adding them as bridesmaids (I think there's already 5 and the bride thinks that's more than enough). Do you guys have any ideas? Have any of you dealt with this situation in your weddings or have friends who have? It's breaking her heart that she can't have them as bridesmaids. And would like to let them know they are special and important. I mentioned that she have them do a reading during the ceremony or reception or have them be bridal attendents. IP: Logged |
|
bookworm Housemate |
Iduds, what my sister did, since she had a small ceremony (only me as the maid of honor) was ask her close friends to do things during the reception, like man the guest book, cut the groom's cake, etc. Some of them also helped out before the ceremony by helping her get dressed, calming nerves, etc. That way they were a part of everything even though they weren't bridesmaids. IP: Logged |
|
mamichan Housemate |
ha ha. now brother-in-law tells me over email that's it's not a big deal if we can only go for the weekend! because he FORGOT he was leaving for his honeymoon on sunday anyway . the ironic thing being, we can now go for (almost the entire) week. my in-laws are so wacky... Iduds, i didn't have any bridesmaids at my wedding, but i found out that some of my friends were offended by that -- so i asked them to come early and greet guests, help out with food stuff, etc -- they all really enjoyed doing it, they said. we also went out the night before, just girls (and a few others, though i think we scared away the others) which was fun. IP: Logged |
This topic is 27 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 All times are PT (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|